Authenticom vs Foureyes
Compare documented scope, then run both against the same demo, integration and contract questions. This is an evidence table—not a winner declaration.
What this comparison establishes
Authenticom and Foureyes meet on 2 shared workflow categories — data integration & middleware and customer data platforms (cdp). Outside that overlap they are not the same purchase: Authenticom additionally covers dealer intelligence & bi; Foureyes additionally covers analytics & attribution, ai lead handling & follow-up. Decide whether the wider record is scope you actually need or scope you will pay for and not use.
Company identity and published scope for Authenticom and Foureyes were each checked against the provider's own material on a recorded date. That establishes what each company says it sells. It does not establish that either will fit your rooftop count, OEM programs, existing DMS or accounting process — those are configuration facts that only a scoped demo and a written order form can settle.
Research statusVerifiedVerified
Corporate parentNone recordedNone recorded
Primary marketUS & CanadaUS & Canada
Typical segmentDealers and vendorsFranchise and groups
Product records34
Mapped categories34
Integration records42
Public pricingNot published — quote per configurationNot published — quote per configuration
Contract termNot established in this recordNot established in this record
Coverage split
Where they overlap, and where they do not
Mapped workflow categories only. Coverage is not capability—confirm the exact modules on the order form.
1 additional category
2 additional categories
What you are actually buying
Named product lines on each side
Packaging changes. Confirm which of these are separate line items on the order form.
Inside the shared categories, Authenticom fields 3 named lines against it (DealerVault, Dealer Data Exchange, Data Syndication); Foureyes fields 3 named lines against it (Unified Data Platform, Safety Net, Prospect Engagement). Product names are packaging, and packaging changes — ask each provider which of these appear on the order form as separate line items, which are bundled, and which are add-ons priced later.
A
Authenticom
- Authenticom DealerVault — Data integration & middleware
- Authenticom Dealer Data Exchange — Data integration & middleware
- Authenticom Data Syndication — Data integration & middleware
B
Foureyes
- Foureyes Unified Data Platform — Customer data platforms (CDP)
- Foureyes Sales Intelligence — Analytics & attribution
- Foureyes Safety Net — Customer data platforms (CDP)
- Foureyes Prospect Engagement — Customer data platforms (CDP)
Eligibility first
Settle these before comparing features
Both records describe the same primary market (US & Canada). Market is therefore not a gate here, but country-level availability of specific modules still varies — confirm the modules you need, not just the company.
Typical segment differs: Authenticom is recorded against dealers and vendors and Foureyes against franchise and groups. Segment is a description of who a provider usually serves, not a restriction. Ask each for a reference at your rooftop count and franchise mix rather than assuming the record excludes you.
Ask both the same questions
Evaluation criteria for the shared categories
Drawn from the buying guide for each category both records cover.
Data integration & middleware
- 1
Is the connection read-only or bi-directional?
- 2
Who pays each integration fee?
- 3
What breaks when either product changes?
Customer data platforms (CDP)
- 1
Is the connection read-only or bi-directional?
- 2
Who pays each integration fee?
- 3
What breaks when either product changes?
Integration exposure
Connection records touching either company
Scoped records only. Absence here is a research gap, not evidence that a connection does not exist.
Directory
Authenticom + CDK Global
Certified data access varies by agreement
Reviewed
Authenticom + Impel
Vendor-reported integration
Reviewed
Foureyes + Numa
Vendor-reported integration
Reviewed
Authenticom + automotiveMastermind
Vendor-reported integration
Reviewed
Authenticom + Widewail
Vendor-reported integration
Reviewed
Foureyes + DealerSocket
Certified integration partner
Run the same proof
Five decisive tests
- 1
Complete one real workflow end to end, including an exception.
- 2
Trace one record through every integration in both directions.
- 3
Export a usable sample dataset and open it without the vendor.
- 4
Force a support escalation and time the response.
- 5
Price implementation through termination, including renewal increases.
What this comparison cannot establish
Pricing, negotiated terms, OEM program eligibility, configured integrations, support quality and implementation outcomes vary by dealer and are not published here. This page compares documented scope and supplies the questions. The answers have to come from a written proposal, a scoped demo and a reference running your DMS and OEM.
Authenticom vs Foureyes FAQ
What is the difference between Authenticom and Foureyes?
Authenticom and Foureyes meet on 2 shared workflow categories — data integration & middleware and customer data platforms (cdp). Outside that overlap they are not the same purchase: Authenticom additionally covers dealer intelligence & bi; Foureyes additionally covers analytics & attribution, ai lead handling & follow-up. Decide whether the wider record is scope you actually need or scope you will pay for and not use. Beyond mapped scope, the difference that matters to a dealer is configuration: which modules are on the order form, which integrations are live for your DMS, who performs the implementation, and what the three-year cost is including renewal increases.
Is Authenticom or Foureyes better for a dealership?
Neither is named better here, and any source that names a universal winner in this category is not describing your store. Fit depends on rooftop count, OEM programs, the systems already in place, the department that has to adopt it, and the contract. Run both against the same workflow and the same questions, then compare what each proved.
Do Authenticom and Foureyes do the same thing?
They overlap on data integration & middleware, customer data platforms (cdp). They are not equivalent outside that overlap — see the coverage split above.
How much do Authenticom and Foureyes cost?
This directory does not publish a universal price for either, because dealership software is quoted per configuration and the same product can differ several-fold between two stores. Ask both for the same thing in writing: modules and quantities, implementation, integration and usage fees, the initial term, the renewal mechanic, the annual increase, and the cost to leave.
Which integrates better with my DMS?
That cannot be answered from a directory record, and any page that claims to is guessing. Ask each provider to state, in writing and for your DMS version: the direction of the connection, the data objects, the refresh interval, who owns and supports the connection, and the fee. Then ask your DMS provider the same questions and compare the two answers.
Can I run both Authenticom and Foureyes?
Sometimes, but overlapping systems in data integration & middleware, customer data platforms (cdp) usually create duplicate data entry and an unclear source of truth. If you are considering both, define which system owns each record before you sign either contract.
What should I ask in the demo?
Use the same script for both, drawn from the shared categories above, and require the exception cases rather than the happy path. Record what is native, what is configured, what is delivered by a partner, and what is on a roadmap.
Where does this comparison stop being useful?
At the order form. This page compares documented scope and gives you the questions to ask. It cannot tell you what either company will quote you, what its support will feel like at 5pm on the last day of the month, or whether the integration you need is live for your configuration. Those come from references and a written proposal.