CDVCar Dealer VendorsFind software →
Integration record

Impel and Frazer

Vendor-reported integration

Reviewed evidence statusSeptember 1, 2026 last reviewed
Integration scope

What this record establishes

Confirmed September 1, 2026. Fields marked not established are research gaps, not evidence of absence.

StatusVendor-reported integration
EvidenceReviewed
DirectionNot established — confirm with both providers for the dealer's configuration
Data objectsNot established — confirm with both providers for the dealer's configuration
MethodNot established — confirm with both providers for the dealer's configuration
FeesNot established — confirm with both providers for the dealer's configuration
ConfirmedSeptember 1, 2026
Sourceimpel.ai

One-sided: named on Impel's own integrations page. Not confirmed against Frazer documentation.

Direct answer

Do not infer compatibility from this page alone.

An integration decision requires the exact product, version, OEM, market, data objects and commercial agreement. Ask both vendors to confirm direction, frequency, write-back, provider, fees, monitoring and support ownership in writing.

□

Products and versions

□

Dealer/OEM applicability

□

Read and write objects

□

Batch or real-time timing

□

Authentication method

□

Integration provider

□

Setup and recurring fees

□

Failure monitoring

□

Support owner on each side

□

Termination and data deletion

Direct answer

What this record does and does not establish

This record is at Reviewed status: the relationship is described in current provider or market material but has not been confirmed from both sides with a scope statement. Treat it as a lead worth pursuing rather than a compatibility guarantee. The most common failure is a connection that exists for some configurations and not for yours.

Verification procedure

How to confirm this for your store

Open the worksheet →
Ask both sides, separatelyRequest a written scope statement from Impel and from Frazer. Where the two disagree, that disagreement is the finding — and it is far cheaper to discover now than during implementation.
Establish directionRead, write, or both. A system that can read your data but not write back leaves someone re-keying, and that person is usually in your store rather than the vendor's.
Name the objects and fields"Customer data" is not a scope. Ask which records and which fields move — and specifically whether notes, attachments, history and status changes travel, because those are the ones usually excluded.
Pin the frequencyReplace "real time" with a number: how often, and what the worst-case delay is. Then decide whether that delay is acceptable for the workflow it supports.
Identify the owner and the support pathWhich company owns the connection, which one you call when it breaks, and what the response commitment is. Connections with two possible owners have none.
Get the fee in writingFrom both sides, including who is billed, the unit of measure, and what happens when volume changes or either product is upgraded.
Test with a real recordMove one real record end to end and watch it arrive, including an update and a deletion. A demonstration in a vendor sandbox proves the sandbox works.
Ask how failure surfacesEstablish whether a broken connection alerts anyone, queues or silently drops. Silent failure is the common case and the expensive one.
Why this matters

An unscoped connection is a cost you have not priced

Integration is where dealership software estimates most often go wrong. A product bought on its own merits can arrive with a connection fee charged by a different vendor, a direction that leaves someone re-keying, and a support path that neither party owns. None of that appears in a subscription quote.

Ask for the scope in writing before signature, because after signature it becomes a change request. If either provider will not put direction, objects, frequency, ownership and fee in writing, treat that as the answer.

Questions dealers ask

Impel and Frazer integration FAQ

Does Impel integrate with Frazer?

This record is at Reviewed status: the relationship is described in current provider or market material but has not been confirmed from both sides with a scope statement. Treat it as a lead worth pursuing rather than a compatibility guarantee. The most common failure is a connection that exists for some configurations and not for yours. The record status is "Vendor-reported integration", confirmed September 1, 2026.

How do I verify it for my dealership?

Ask both providers for a written scope statement covering direction, objects and fields, frequency, the owning party, the support path and the fee — then move one real record end to end and watch it arrive. A partner logo, a marketplace listing or a slide is not a scope statement.

What does it cost to connect Impel and Frazer?

No price is published here. Integration is commonly billed separately from either subscription, sometimes by the system being connected to rather than the product you are buying. Ask both sides who bills whom, on what unit, and what changes when your volume changes.

What happens when the connection breaks?

That depends entirely on what you negotiated. Establish before signing which company owns the fault, what the response commitment is, whether records queue or drop while it is down, and whether anyone is alerted. Most stores discover the answer during the outage.

Is this integration available for every dealership?

Not necessarily. Connections are frequently limited by product edition, region, OEM program, DMS version or contract. Confirm eligibility for your exact configuration rather than for the product name.

What if there is no record here for the pair I need?

Absence in this directory is a research gap, not evidence that no connection exists. Ask both providers directly, and if you establish a scoped connection, the corrections route below will add it with the source you were given.

Review boundary

Facts can change by product, version, OEM, market and contract. Verify the exact configuration before making a purchase or migration decision.

Report a precise correction →Corrections policy →