Dealership technology stack assessment
Define dealership context, decision pressure and the proof every shortlisted provider must supply.
What this assessment produces
A first-pass evaluation lens based on dealership type, rooftop count and the decision pressure driving the change. It does not rank providers or infer compatibility; it tells you which questions matter most for your situation before you watch a demo.
Selections stay in your browser on this device. Nothing is transmitted, and no sign-in is required.
Define the architecture before watching demos.
This first-pass assessment turns store context into evaluation priorities. It does not rank vendors or infer compatibility.
Why a first-pass lens beats a longer feature list
A feature list rewards the provider with the most features, which is rarely the same as the provider that fits. What actually decides a dealership technology decision is a small number of structural facts: what is failing today, what the store already runs, which contracts can be moved this year, and how much change the departments can absorb at once. This lens puts those first so a shortlist is narrowed by fit before anyone is judged on a demonstration.
What this assessment deliberately does not do
It does not rank providers, assert compatibility between products, or predict an outcome. Nothing in this directory establishes that a given platform will work in a given store, because that depends on configuration, OEM eligibility, existing integrations and the people who will use it. What the lens produces is a set of questions worth more than a generic shortlist — nothing more than that, and it is stated plainly so the output is not mistaken for a recommendation.
Nothing here is transmitted, stored or seen
Your selections stay in this browser on this device. There is no account, no form submission and no server-side record of what you chose — this directory has no database and collects nothing about the people who read it. That is a deliberate design choice rather than a feature: a tool that quietly turned a procurement plan into a sales lead would be worth less than no tool. Clearing this browser’s storage clears the work, so export or copy anything you want to keep.
What to do with the result this week
Two things are worth doing before anything else, because both constrain what is decidable at all. Establish the notice window on every current agreement, since a renewal that auto-extends next month removes that decision from this year. Then confirm which systems hold authority over the records the new tool would touch, because a decision made on the assumption of a platform you may replace has to be made twice.
Turn the lens into a shortlist
1. Start from the workflow that is failing, not from a product category. The trigger determines the shortlist.
2. Check the renewal calendar before deciding anything — notice windows dictate what is actually decidable this year.
3. Settle the systems of record first. Decisions that assume a DMS or CRM you may replace have to be redone.
4. Limit concurrent change per department. Two simultaneous rollouts usually means neither is adopted.
It does not rank providers, score vendors, infer compatibility with your systems, or establish price. It organises your own requirements so that the answers you collect are comparable.