Dealer eProcess Video vs MAX Digital Merchandising
These product records share documented category coverage. The comparison does not claim equivalent features, availability, compatibility or performance and does not select a winner.
What this comparison establishes
Dealer eProcess Video is a Dealer eProcess line; MAX Digital Merchandising is a MAX Digital line. They meet on inventory merchandising. Dealer eProcess fields 4 other named lines around Dealer eProcess Video, against 3 for MAX Digital. The wider portfolio is not automatically better — ask whether you are buying one product or the first step into a suite.
A product record resolves a name to a provider and maps it to dealer workflows. It does not establish that Dealer eProcess Video and MAX Digital Merchandising have equivalent features, that either is available in your market or OEM program, that either integrates with your DMS at the field level, or what either costs in your configuration. Product-family names routinely cover materially different editions — the same name can mean different software in two stores.
Dealer eProcess Video
Dealer eProcess Video is its inventory-based video merchandising product, generating vehicle video for detail pages and marketing. Confirm capture requirements and how video attaches to inventory.
Product record → · Dealer eProcess profile →MAX Digital Merchandising
MAX Digital Merchandising presents market-based vehicle information and pricing at the point of sale and on the VDP. Confirm how content attaches to inventory.
Product record → · MAX Digital profile →What else each provider fields
Buying a line item can be the first step into a stack. Ask which of these are prerequisites and which are priced separately at renewal.
Settle these before comparing features
Both records describe the same primary market (US). Market is therefore not a gate here, but country-level availability of specific modules still varies — confirm the modules you need, not just the company.
Typical segment differs: Dealer eProcess is recorded against franchise and independents and MAX Digital against franchise and groups. Segment is a description of who a provider usually serves, not a restriction. Ask each for a reference at your rooftop count and franchise mix rather than assuming the record excludes you.
One side is part of a larger group and the other is not
MAX Digital is owned by ACV; Dealer eProcess is not part of that group. That difference usually shows up in three places: which integrations are internal and therefore cheap, how much of your stack ends up under a single contract and a single renewal, and how much leverage you keep at renewal. Neither structure is better in the abstract. Ask MAX Digital what is bundled and what is separately licensed, and ask Dealer eProcess what it costs to connect to the systems you already run.
Evaluation criteria for the shared workflow
Inventory merchandising
- 1
Who owns audiences, accounts and creative?
- 2
How is incrementality measured?
- 3
Can spend and fees be separated cleanly?
Ask both providers for the same proof
Exact edition, modules and usage limits
Required dealer and OEM eligibility
The same end-to-end workflow, including an exception
The same integration objects and write-back direction
The same implementation and migration assumptions
The same three-year pricing schedule with renewal increases
The same security, continuity and incident evidence
The same export and offboarding test
Feature equivalence, availability, OEM eligibility, integration behaviour, support quality and price are configuration facts. They are not published here and cannot be inferred from a shared category. Get them in writing from both providers for your exact configuration.
Dealer eProcess Video vs MAX Digital Merchandising FAQ
What is the difference between Dealer eProcess Video and MAX Digital Merchandising?
Dealer eProcess Video comes from Dealer eProcess and MAX Digital Merchandising from MAX Digital. Both are mapped to inventory merchandising in this directory. The difference that decides the purchase is the edition on the order form, the integrations live for your DMS, who implements it and what the three-year cost is — none of which a directory can settle for your store.
Are Dealer eProcess Video and MAX Digital Merchandising the same kind of product?
They are mapped to the same workflow ground (inventory merchandising), which is why they appear together here. Shared category means comparable purpose, not comparable capability.
Which one integrates with my DMS?
Ask both providers to state it in writing for your DMS and version: direction, data objects, refresh interval, who owns the connection, who supports it when it breaks, and the fee. Then ask your DMS provider the same questions. A partner logo is not a scope statement.
How much does each cost?
Neither price is published here. Dealership software is quoted per configuration, and the same named product can differ several-fold between two stores. Request modules and quantities, implementation, integration and usage fees, initial term, renewal mechanic, annual increase and exit cost — from both, in the same format.
Do I have to buy the rest of the provider's stack?
Ask directly. Dealer eProcess and MAX Digital both field other named lines, and the answer that matters is which of them are prerequisites, which are bundled at no extra cost today but priced separately at renewal, and what happens commercially if you later drop one.
Can I run both?
Running two products in inventory merchandising usually creates duplicate entry and an unclear source of truth. If you are considering both, decide which one owns each record before signing either.
What should the demo prove?
The same workflow, in the same order, on both — including the exception case. Record what is native, what is configured, what a partner delivers and what is on a roadmap. Anything on a roadmap is not a feature you are buying today.
Where does this page stop?
At the order form. It compares documented scope and gives you the questions. What either provider will actually quote, support and deliver comes from a written proposal and a reference running your DMS and OEM.